Skip to content
Monday, October 12, 2026
Nestle Deck UK

Tetris Wouldn't Win at This Gaming Ceremony — A New Category Could Fix That

As any prominent awards ceremony nears, you'll find a demand for introducing fresh award types to honor underappreciated efforts and fill the spirits of enthusiasts dedicated to specific genres.

Another commentator made the case for a horror game category. It would be amazing. The same goes for strategy board titles, representing a passionate advocate's mission. Yet I need to apologize in advance for pushing forward since similar to single-minded supporters, I have a cast-iron argument supporting my request is the most urgent above others. Here's the proposal: There should be a category for puzzle games.

The Genre Classification Challenge

Categorizing art by genre is not a science; it remains highly personal, and inevitably spark debates resulting in unclear classifications. This explains why cinema institutions steer clear of genre categories. But it is an essential concession in the world of interactive entertainment, showing incredible range they barely qualify as a single art form.

To recognize the complete range of achievement in video games to receive acknowledgment, while allowing diverse titles to have a chance for representation, genre categories are essential.

Existing Game Classification System

The major gaming awards currently feature classifications covering Action-oriented games, Adventure-action titles, RPG experiences, Fighting, Sim/Strategy, plus athletic and racing experiences. Together, these six categories actually cover a lot of ground, and you can find room accommodating various experiences.

Not so for brain-teasing titles. There’s simply nowhere to put them. Think about these outstanding current releases, showing diverse approaches: the architectural riddles from a specific release, fast-paced pattern recognition in a different title, engaging interpersonal challenges from additional release. Which classification works among existing types? Simply put, no category fits.

The Representation Problem

There are dozens excellent brain-teasers released every year without proper recognition during gaming ceremonies, except when they manage to fit award groups including Mobile Game, VR/AR Game, and the highly challenging small studio competitions.

  • A renowned logic title received no recognition in any category that year
  • Another imaginative release was excluded that year
  • Well-received sorting experience received no acknowledgment recently
  • Just some logic titles barely qualified for niche award types

Significance of Puzzle Games

These are often modest productions, yet the craft of the puzzle game holds tremendous importance. Iconic mobile puzzle games rank among most engaged experiences worldwide continuing this trend for over a decade.

The famous puzzle experience competes with well-known building titles competing to become most purchased experience; it additionally competes for top gaming experience. Logic titles represent cornerstones within interactive entertainment, and engaging across multiple categories.

Recommendation and Reasoning

Puzzle games wouldn’t have that issue. You could fill a field of five engaging, different, qualified experiences every year with ease — or rather, with difficulty, because you’d have to leave many worthy titles.

And to reiterate, these include experiences without proper classification in important events. Brain-teaser creators function at the demanding boundary interactive creation, creating some of essential manifestations of gaming itself. Comparable to film action specialists, they warrant appreciation. Let’s not keep them waiting decades.

About the author

Amanda Johnson

Environmental scientist and advocate for green living, sharing expertise on sustainability and eco-innovation.

Nestle Deck UK

Type to search articles.